Conservation of Waterford Lands

About Us

We are a collection of residents of Waterford Township, Michigan who were made aware in 2020 that former state park land in our township was being sold for income by the Road Commission for Oakland County to a private developer as a residential development. Being part of a treasured greenway outside the popular park entrance, and part of a memorial highway for our young lost soldiers in Iraq, as well as having been reassured by a former county commissioner that there were no plans to develop the land, we grew concerned that our township had no protections at all to keep permanent developments from completely covering our township, as has been done in other Metro Detroit municipalities. Our fledgling advocacy didn't succeed in preserving this lot, despite securing some natural land in the site plan; but we organized COWL to bring more tools to the cause. We have a few remaining parcels of wild land serving as a proper refuge for our wild birds, animals, plants, and pollinators, and we'd like to help protect and expand them in the public interest, and to make them accessible for their physical and mental health benefits to our considerable population.


If issues arise where we can raise awareness about further loss of wild land, we are happy to hear them and if possible, to take action at the local level.

We have open meetings every quarter, and will appoint our leadership board in the first quarter of every year via election. 


We are now a full 501c3 charitable organization, and are able to raise funds properly as tax-exempt, charitable contributions (button at top of page.) Please check out our social media links at the bottom of the page! 

     Issues/Current Projects

OCC Highland Lakes Campus

Various Parcel ID Numbers

Posterity Fund

Conservation Zoning

Because our township:

We would like to propose a new zoning tool for the township. As we are running out of wild land, it is time to begin protecting what little is leftA new zoning district called "conservation" would add rules to ensure we have some wild land for future generations in every neighborhood. This zoning will apply to existing parks wherever possible to prevent development if the land is separated from the park for any reason. And a strong financial position will be important for the township to buy land for the unlucky neighborhoods which currently have no nature.

Park Accessibility and Wild Status

Our large township population stands to benefit more than most, by enjoyment of the thousands of species visible and audible in our greenspace. We have a small amount of park land, but much of it is mowed lawn. The wild portions would need more walking/biking trails to be appreciated fully. Therefore we would like to seek opportunities to expand and make accessible the township portfolio of naturally-occurring wildlife land. Elizabeth Lake Woods is a very fine example of wildland conservation, but there is no bridge over the river in the middle, and the trails are overgrown, so the use and enjoyment is limited. We would like to see a simple trail and bridge from one side to the other that allows kayakers to easily proceed under it.

Teal Island Proposed Development (Dormant)

13-20-151-001  North-East Corner of Hospital Rd and Pontiac Lake Rd

Williams Hatchery Development (Retired)

13-18-100-008 

Brief history:

In 2020, between 50 and 100 residents showed up to the Civic Center to protest this development. The meeting, which was a Planning Commission meeting, had to be relocated outdoors due to the COVID pandemic and the impressive turnout. The speakers were eloquent and well-reasoned. The points they brought up were solid. A couple of folks were evidently shaken by the proposal. The board voted unanimously not to recommend the project be approved by the Board of Trustees, due to the turnout. The Oakland Press published an article saying the development had been shut down, so we contacted the author and asked for edits, because the development of this lot was still likely to end up succeeding, ultimately. We didn't want the public to think it was over. With a few changes to the site plan, the development ultimately did succeed the following year. The board of trustees voted no by a vote of 3-4, causing the residents to celebrate, but a special action was taken to re-vote at the following meeting, granting the re-zone to the applicant after all.

Why we opposed development of this lot: